As India Mulls Bill Modeled on Bayh-Dole, Critics Claim It
May Stifle Innovation By Ben Butkus in the Biotech Transfer Week Mag points out
to the "The Bayh-Dole Act and Promoting the Transfer of Technology of Publicly
Funded-Research" a UAEM White Paper on the Proposed Indian
Bayh-Dole Analogue. To read the Universities Allied For Essential Medicines white
paper click here.
The Biotech Transfer Week's pierce says "UAEM echoed these
concerns and introduced several more of its own in a white paper that analyzes
various provisions of the Indian bill and raises questions about how the
Bayh-Dole Act impacts university patenting in the
For instance, the UAEM suggests that both the Bayh-Dole Act
and the proposed Indian IP Act focus too narrowly on patenting and licensing at
the expense of other forms of "knowledge production" such as scientific
publishing; and that the proposed act would "encourage research institutions to
obtain patents on publicly funded research to the exclusion of other methods
that could in many situations be more beneficial to access and encouraging
future innovation," such as peer-reviewed publication.
UAEM also claims that the Indian IP Act contains only weak
safeguards for ensuring access to life-saving medicines for developing nations
such as
"Instead of fixing this problem, the Indian IP Act currently
has fewer safeguards aimed at preserving public access," the paper adds. "Under
the Indian IP Act, the government [loses] its opportunity to preserve access to
publicly funded research just 90 days after learning of the new technology."
The white paper concludes that the Indian IP Bill "has
serious flaws which need to be addressed in an open and public setting to
determine whether any legislation should be enacted and if so what kind."
"Given the track record of Bayh-Dole in the
To read the entire article by Ben Butkus in the Biotech Transfer Week Mag click here.
