SCOTUSblog reports that a New Hampshire law that seeks to stop the use of Rx reports to try to persuade doctors to prescribe brand-name drugs is being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court. The case is being "framed as a major new test of how far the First Amendment allows
government to go to regulate the gathering of data and re-packaging it
for publication." Under scrutiny is NH's "Prescription Information Law" (RSA 318:47-f), enacted in 2006 that provides criminal and civil penalties for those who
distribute prescription histories for a "commercial purpose." The case: I.M.S. Health, Inc. v. Ayotte, 550 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2008).
SCOTUSblog (includes links to documents): http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/plea-for-freer-commercial-speech/
RSA 318:47-f: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXX/318/318-47-f.htm
SCOTUSblog (includes links to documents): http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/plea-for-freer-commercial-speech/
RSA 318:47-f: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXX/318/318-47-f.htm
